World heritage status losing its appeal to travellers
Tuesday, September 29th, 2009Am I the only person that thinks that the Unesco World Heritage site status list is starting to look nothing like a list of unique and diverse places? I think that status is given out too easily nowadays and wasn’t it last year that there was outcry because Benidorm had applied.

Status list too large
Maybe it’s my understanding of the status but I can understand places like the Great Wall of China and Machu Picchu being on the list, but Saltaire and Stonehenge? They are now 890 properties within the world heritage site status list, a mixture of bridges, churches, and other cultural and natural places.
Lost its appeal to travellers
I would love to have said that I have been to 1% of the places but I haven’t but I do sometimes wonder if it has lost some of its appeal to travellers. Visiting a world heritage site doesn’t seem as appealing as it was ten or so years ago when the list was much smaller.
Your thoughts on the list
Should the list be reduced and which places would you take off. Or do you think that some places should be added to UNESCO World heritage list. Or am I talking a load of nonsense. Feel free to add your opinion, it’ll be interesting to read our thoughts on this topic.
This post was syndicated from the Travel Rants Blog.
World heritage status losing its appeal to travellers














